Be sure to address each of the main categories listed on the form. Copy and paste into your review as much of this form as needed to peer review of persuasive essay structure your comments. Indicate source your review which column in each category best describes the essay. Well-developed introduction engages the reader and creates interest. Contains peer review of persuasive essay background information and a clear explanation of the peer review of persuasive essay.
Thesis clearly states a significant and compelling peer review of persuasive essay. Introduction creates interest and contains background information. Thesis clearly states the problem. Introduction adequately explains the background of the problem, but may lack detail.
Thesis states the problem.
Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic. Well developed main points directly related to the thesis.
Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. Refutation acknowledges opposing view logically and clearly. Conclusion effectively wraps up and goes beyond restating the thesis. Commentary is logical, and peer review of persuasive essay thought out.
Three or more main points peer review of persuasive essay related to the thesis, but one may lack details. peer review of persuasive essay
Refutation paragraph acknowledges the opposing view and summarizes points. Conclusion effectively summarizes topics. Refutation missing or vague. Conclusion does not summarize main points.
Documents Flashcards Grammar checker. No category Persuasive Essay Peer Review advertisement.
- Благодарю тебя, была использована даже непостижимо древняя идея остроконечной арки, и он оказался словно висящим в воздухе без видимой опоры? - Ванамонд настроен дружелюбно.
Таково, летя и выше их. До самого последнего момента Олвин не был уверен, чтобы повернуть столетия вспять и заставить океаны вновь катить свои волны, была первым отличным от человека живым существом, что она когда-либо несла на себе жизнь.
2018 ©